Lessons From Lown Archives - Lown Institute https://lowninstitute.org/category/lessons-from-lown/ Thu, 17 Mar 2022 13:40:54 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.3.1 https://lowninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/lown-icon-140x140.jpg Lessons From Lown Archives - Lown Institute https://lowninstitute.org/category/lessons-from-lown/ 32 32 Lessons from Lown: Crisis at the Nobel Prize conference https://lowninstitute.org/lessons-from-lown-crisis-at-the-nobel-prize-conference/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=lessons-from-lown-crisis-at-the-nobel-prize-conference Wed, 15 Dec 2021 19:12:26 +0000 https://lowninstitute.org/?p=9646 On December 9, 1985, Dr. Bernard Lown and Dr. Yevgeni Chazov were about to accept the Nobel Peace Prize, for their work uniting doctors against nuclear war. Lown and Chazov had no idea they would be saving a life that day.

The post Lessons from Lown: Crisis at the Nobel Prize conference appeared first on Lown Institute.

]]>
On December 9, 1985, Dr. Bernard Lown and Dr. Yevgeni Chazov were about to accept the Nobel Peace Prize for their work uniting doctors against nuclear war. Lown and Chazov had no idea they would also be called on to save a life that day.

The Bernard Lown Award for Social Responsibility

In honor of our late founder Dr. Bernard Lown, and because we need more clinicians like him, we created the Bernard Lown Award for Social Responsibility. The Bernard Lown Award will be given to a young clinician who exemplifies the courage and humanitarian spirit of Dr. Lown.

Watch the video footage

Watch this documentary excerpt to see how US and Russian doctors worked together to save the life of a journalist at the 1985 Nobel Prize conference. The story is narrated by Dr. John Pastore, Dr. Lown’s former colleague and fellow activist. The documentary was filmed and produced by Craig Atkinson and Ishita Gupta in 2011.

In Dr. Lown’s words

For more details on the story of the Nobel Prize press conference, we’ve included lightly-edited excerpts from Dr. Lown’s memoir, Prescription for Survival: A Doctor’s Journey to End Nuclear Madness.

The antagonistic press conference

Monday, December 9, was a bone-chilling day. The Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs arranged the press conference at the SAS Hotel in downtown Oslo. The room was overheated before we started, packed with more than two hundred journalists and physicians sitting and standing shoulder to shoulder. Chazov and I sat at a dais along with representatives of our global movement. 

When the press conference started, questions came in rapid succession. None were related to the nuclear arms race that threatened human existence. The questioners were working in unison and were focused on Soviet human rights abuses, Soviet psychiatry, and questions about the mistreatment of particular dissidents. We were now accustomed to being asked about everything but our work.

“None of the questions were related to the nuclear arms race that threatened human existence.”

We explained the need, despite vexing issues such as human rights, to work together with the Soviets to end the nuclear threat. We emphasized the importance of IPPNW as a single-issue organization and said that that if we had to resolve all other issues first, we would never have a dialogue on the nuclear threat.

It became evident that there was no interest in a reasoned exchange. Instead of presenting our case, we were shut out from the debate by venomous prosecutorial grilling that degenerated into shouted abuse.

A sudden cardiac arrest before our very eyes

About twenty minutes into the press conference, a man sitting on a small sofa to the left of the dias began to convulse, then slumped over unconscious…

At this press conference, we were discussing sudden nuclear death, which threatened millions. Before our very eyes was a sudden cardiac arrest about to end the life of a single human being. 

The entire hall was in an uproar as Chazov and I, joined by others, took turns in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) until an emergency squad arrives with the appropriate medical equipment. The room was full of physicians. We worked as a team, rhythmically compressing the chest and providing mouth-to-mouth ventilation. We later learned the victim was a sixty-year-old Russian TV cinematographer.

“Before our very eyes was a sudden cardiac arrest about to end the life of a single human being.”  

After what seemed like an eternity, an ambulance crew with a defibrillator arrived. But several electrical discharges failed to restore a normal heart rhythm. It was increasingly unlikely that the patient would survive. Surveying the horrific scene, I was beset by a superstitious despair that his death would proclaim the futility of IPPNW’s quest… I was overwhelmed with desolation for the human condition. The Norwegian rescue team pronounced the patient dead and rolled the body out of the hall.

“The only thing that matters is saving a human life.”

The press conference reassembled. Certain that the Soviet journalist had died…I spoke slowly, as though I were participating in a séance intended to commune with dead souls. 

“We have just witnessed what doctoring is about. When faced with a dire emergency of sudden cardiac arrest, doctors do not inquire whether the patient was a good person or criminal. We do not delay treatment to learn the politics or character of the victim. We respond not as ideologues, nor as Russians, nor Americans, but as doctors. The only thing that matters is saving a human life. The world is threatened with sudden nuclear death. We work with doctors whatever their political convictions to save our endangered home. You have just witnessed IPPNW in action.”

“We respond not as ideologues, nor as Russians, nor Americans, but as doctors.”  

As I was speaking, I was unaware that one more electrical shock had been administered and the victim’s heart had miraculously resumed regular beating. When we visited him in the hospital a day later, he was still in intensive care…but he was on the way to recovery.

The day after the incident, it seemed as though the whole world had been watching. The attitude toward us in the Norwegian media changed overnight. This one event accomplished what a torrent of words failed to do and provided an uplifting mood for the award ceremonies that soon followed. 

About the series

Dr. Bernard Lown (1921-2021) was a pioneering cardiologist, humanitarian, and founder of the Lown Institute. In honor of Dr. Lown, we are sharing stories from his remarkable life in his own words, through video and written content.

The post Lessons from Lown: Crisis at the Nobel Prize conference appeared first on Lown Institute.

]]>
Lessons from Lown: The story of “white” and “colored” blood https://lowninstitute.org/lessons-from-lown-the-story-of-white-and-colored-blood/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=lessons-from-lown-the-story-of-white-and-colored-blood Tue, 18 May 2021 14:49:39 +0000 https://lowninstitute.org/?p=8624 When Dr. Lown came to Baltimore for medical school in 1942, he found that everything was segregated -- even the blood at the hospital's blood bank.

Watch the video and read the blog below to hear in Dr. Lown's own words how he rebelled against this racist practice.

The post Lessons from Lown: The story of “white” and “colored” blood appeared first on Lown Institute.

]]>
When Dr. Lown came was in medical school in 1942, he worked in a hospital blood bank. The blood was segregated, but he refused to honor the racist system.

The Bernard Lown Award for Social Responsibility

Do you know a clinician who stands up for racial justice? We created the Bernard Lown Award for Social Responsibility to honor young clinicians who are taking the lead in social justice and other humanitarian causes.

Dr. Lown tells the story of the segregated blood bank

In this video interview, Dr. Lown explains how he rebelled against segregation at his medical school. This video was recorded at the Avoiding Avoidable Care conference in April 2012 in Cambridge, MA.

In Dr. Lown’s words

For more details on this story, we’ve included an abridged version of Dr. Lown’s 2011 blog post, “Black blood must not contaminate white folks.” A warning that the full version of this story contains strong language and references to racial slurs.

“We have already filled the quota allotted to your people”

In the mid-20th century the Johns Hopkins Medical School was at the apogee for training doctors in the US. My matriculating there was a fluke. Every other medical school I had applied to rejected me because of my Jewish heritage. The dean of the Harvard Medical School made no bones about the matter. In an interview he told me outright, “We have already filled the quota allotted to your people.”

“In the hospital there were separate white and black wards, white and black toilets, white and black dining facilities. Even the water fountains were segregated.”

In numerous ways medical school presented a culture shock from which there was no ready recovery. The physical and psychological stresses grated less than the incessant, all-pervasive racism. I encountered apartheid South Africa in Baltimore. Blacks sat in the back of buses and streetcars. In the hospital there were separate white and black wards, white and black toilets, white and black dining facilities. Even the water fountains were segregated. There were no black doctors, medical students, or nurses.

Having barely escaped the Holocaust, I was sensitized to the lethality of prejudice. The United States was in the midst of a life-and-death struggle against the penultimate purveyors of racism and anti-Semitism. Americans were heralding the war’s aim of promoting fundamental human values. Yet, right in our heartland these very precepts were being egregiously violated. For me, silence was incongruent with being a moral human being.

Changing “colored” blood to “white” blood

Working in the blood bank, I immediately confronted a conflict in values. Black blood had to be kept apart from white blood. This was especially galling since apartheid in blood had no scientific basis. Yet it was being practiced in one of the leading medical schools in the country, an institution that prided itself on being a pioneer in promoting science-based medicine while it distinguished donated blood with tags labeled either C (for “colored”) or W (for “white”).

“In one of the leading medical schools in the country, black blood was kept apart from white blood.”

While the blood bank never lacked for black blood, white blood was always in short supply. Several reasons accounted for the surfeit of black blood. Blacks lived in closely knit communities, with social activities centered on a much frequented Baptist church. Periodically the minister would issue a call for blood, thereby mobilizing a flood of volunteers.

An additional, not widely known, factor that kept up a steady supply of black blood was a crafty maneuver evolved by the surgical house staff. When black blood was running low, they would select a black male patient who was to be discharged that very day and made him stuporous with morphine. As family members assembled to take the patient home, they were dismayed by what they were led to believe was an unanticipated critical turn. In fact, they were told that survival was in question.

The intern indicated that the only possible salvation was in administering “blood concentrate,” a clear solution, each pint of which equaled 10 bottles of blood. The family urged the prompt infusion of this precious life-saving liquid, whatever the cost, and promised to rouse the Negro community to donate blood. The intern then hung a bottle of “blood concentrate,” which was nothing but glucose and saline. Within a few hours the cure was miraculous and the blood bank was deluged with black donors.

“Single-handedly I sabotaged the system… with a black crayon.”

I decided not to partake in the immoral charade. Single-handedly I sabotaged the system. I did it with a black crayon. Whenever we were running low on white blood, I would take a number of bottles of black blood and add on the tag a mirror letter C to the one already there. The result resembled the letter W. Lo and behold, the blood was now white. On the nights and weekends I covered the blood bank, it was never lacking in white blood.

The magic crayon

One Sunday evening a junior assistant resident in urology, let’s call him John, came to have his blood drawn. This was to be donated to a Southerner, a former military colonel from Georgia, who was scheduled to have prostate surgery the next day. According to John, the Georgian grew very exercised that being in the North, “in damn Yankee country,” he might get polluted “mongrel blood” …

He questioned John’s pedigree, and finding his Southern antecedents acceptable, proposed to buy John’s blood for a price that could not be refused. The colonel was ready to pay $50 a pint, then a fortune, exceeding the monthly house staff stipend. As the patient had cancer of the prostate and was already quite anemic, he was to receive the transfusion preoperatively.

Though I was not yet a doctor, John appeared to me as though he himself could profit from a transfusion. He was pale, skinny, gaunt, even haggard looking.

“You may not survive a blood letting. You will probably croak, and I will be tried for manslaughter,” I indicated.

“For that much money it was worth chancing suicide,” he replied.

“I have a better suggestion,” I said, “Why don’t you take some bank blood and claim it as your own. Who would know the difference? I ain’t gonna tell.”

He liked the suggestion. However, when I looked for white blood, none of the Georgian’s type was available. There was plenty of black blood. So I took out my crayon and performed the magical scribble, and presto! We had the appropriate white blood.

The colonel was invigorated by the transfusion, maintaining that he hadn’t felt so good in years. He profusely complimented John for the wholesome quality of his Southern blood and demanded a second transfusion, for which he offered to increase the ante to $75. To this John enthusiastically acceded. He came charging in to the blood bank looking more alive than I had seen him in months. He showed me that there was nothing like dollars in the pocket to put color in the cheeks. I performed the same crayoning on a second bottle of black blood.

Expelled for speaking out

The story eventually reached the director of surgery and he called me in to his office. In stentorian tones tremulous with rage, speaking in a barely comprehensible Southern drawl, he enunciated in Churchillian prose, “Neva in the long history of infamy had such an immoral act been committed by someone aspiring to be a docta.” He was probably right about the uniqueness of the deed.

I was also reflecting that at that very moment multitudes were shedding their blood on far-flung battlefields against a fascist philosophy supporting such racism as practiced at Hopkins. Blalock kicked me out of the cushy job at the blood bank. Far worse, I was expelled from medical school.

Fortunately, the chapter of the Association of Interns and Medical Students (a national activist organization) at Johns Hopkins was militant… These brash young doctors expressed a readiness to protest loudly and publicly unless I was immediately reinstated. Along with work stoppages, they planned press conferences as well as other events that would alert the black community to the blatant racism practiced by the Johns Hopkins Medical School.

Within a day I was called in by another director of the hospital, and informed that I was reinstated in the medical school but not in the blood bank. He was very paternal. He stated that he admired my principles but regretted my “impetuous behavior.” “Change has its own tempo,” he continued, “and must flow from the top.” Despite the dean’s office supporting my principles, little changed in the hospital or the blood bank. Segregation of blood continued at Johns Hopkins for another decade.

About the series

Dr. Bernard Lown (1921-2021) was a pioneering cardiologist, humanitarian, and founder of the Lown Institute. In honor of Dr. Lown, we are sharing stories from his remarkable life in his own words, through video and written content. Each episode also ties into an upcoming event sponsored by the Lown Institute Hospitals Index, where we will dive deeper into the topics that meant the most to Dr. Lown.

The post Lessons from Lown: The story of “white” and “colored” blood appeared first on Lown Institute.

]]>
Lessons from Lown: How the Levine Chair changed heart attack treatment forever https://lowninstitute.org/lessons-from-lown-how-the-levine-chair-changed-heart-attack-treatment-forever/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=lessons-from-lown-how-the-levine-chair-changed-heart-attack-treatment-forever Tue, 06 Apr 2021 17:28:32 +0000 https://lowninstitute.org/?p=7769 In the early 1950s, Dr. Bernard Lown made what he called his greatest contribution to medicine, saving 100,000 lives each year and changing the standard of care for heart attack patients forever--simply by getting people out of bed and into a chair. How did this happen? Watch the video and read the blog below to hear the story in Dr. Lown's own words.

The post Lessons from Lown: How the Levine Chair changed heart attack treatment forever appeared first on Lown Institute.

]]>
In the early 1950s, Dr. Bernard Lown made what he called his greatest contribution to medicine, saving 100,000 lives each year and changing the standard of care for heart attack patients forever–simply by getting people out of bed and into a chair. How did this happen? Watch the video and read the blog below to hear the story in Dr. Lown’s own words.

The Bernard Lown Award for Social Responsibility

In honor of our late founder Dr. Bernard Lown, and because we need more clinicians like him, we created the Bernard Lown Award for Social Responsibility. The Bernard Lown Award will be given to a young clinician who exemplifies the courage and humanitarian spirit of Dr. Lown. Nominations are open for the award until March 2022.

Dr. Lown explains the Levine Chair Experiment

In this video interview, Dr. Lown explains the logic behind bed rest in the early 20th century, how he and Dr. Samuel Levine challenged this conventional wisdom, and the obstacles they faced on the way. This video is from a 2010 interview with Dr. Malcolm Maclure, professor and chair in patient safety at the University of British Columbia, Canada.

In Dr. Lown’s words

For more details on this story, we turn once again to Dr. Lown, who gave a thorough accounting of this experiment in a 2011 blog post, “A Chair to the Rescue,” which was initially published in his book, The Lost Art of Healing.

The “unique torture” of bed rest

[In the early 1950s] I began a cardiovascular fellowship under the mentorship of Dr. Samuel A. Levine at the Peter Bent Brigham Hospital (now the Brigham and Women’s Hospital) in Boston. At the time, the major challenge in hospital-based cardiology was dealing with the steady inflow of patients with acute heart attacks. Care was largely palliative: to relieve chest pain, to prevent blood clots, to ease the breathlessness and edema provoked by a failing heart muscle. Patients were confined to strict bed rest for four to six weeks. Sitting in a chair was prohibited. They were not allowed to turn from side to side without assistance. During the first week, they were fed. Moving their bowels and urinating required a bedpan. For the constipated, which included nearly every patient, precariously balancing on a bedpan was agonizing as well as embarrassing.

“Visiting Martians, witnessing this travail, might have judged the scene differently, regarding hospitals as prisons where inmates were subjected to a unique form of torture.”

Dr. Bernard Lown

Because world events might provoke unease, some physicians prohibited their patients from listening to the radio or reading a newspaper. Visits by family members were limited. Since recumbency provoked much restiveness and anxiety, patients required heavy sedation, which contributed to a pervasive sense of hopelessness and depression. Around one in three patients died. Not surprisingly, many died from blood clots migrating to their lungs.

In addition to the pain stemming from the heart attack and the accompanying fear of dying, patients had to cope with the torment of isolation, the indignity of infantilization, and the unbearable distress of excessive bed rest. Physicians convinced themselves and their patients that complete bed rest was the price of survival. Visiting Martians, witnessing this travail, might have judged the scene differently, regarding hospitals as prisons where inmates were subjected to a unique form of torture.

The impact of chair treatment

Dr. Lown looks on as Dr. Levine checks on a patient who was moved from bed rest to a comfortable chair

The study involved getting patients into a comfortable chair for increasing durations on succeeding days. Compared with recumbent patients, ours required fewer narcotics for chest pain, less sedation for anxiety, and fewer sleeping medications. Nurses commented that the patients’ demeanor changed from anxious and depressed to an eagerness to resume normal living. Witnessing even one patient in a chair rapidly won converts from the house staff, who soon became enthusiastic adherents. Patients in chairs promptly began to harangue their doctors to let them walk and pressed for an early discharge.

Despite dire predictions by senior medical attendants that these patients would experience fatal arrhythmias, heart rupture, or congestive heart failure from an overstressed heart muscle, none of those complications were encountered. Comments by patients experiencing their second or third coronary artery occlusion confirmed that we were on the right track. Invariably they indicated that the current episode was the easiest to bear.

Practicing physicians rapidly abandoned the use of strict bed rest. Until our work, patients were kept in the hospital for a month or longer. Within a few years after our publication, the period of hospitalization was reduced by half. The range of activities permitted to patients was extended, and self‑care became the norm. The hateful and dangerous bedpan was abandoned; walking was allowed earlier; hospital mortality was reduced by about a third. Rehabilitation was hastened, and the return to work was accelerated. The time required for full recovery was reduced from three months to one month. Considering the fact that in the United States about one million people suffer heart attacks annually, perhaps as many as one hundred thousand lives were salvaged each year by this simple strategy.

How did doctors respond?

Although I knew that the project would be a chore, I didn’t expect it to be an act of martyrdom. Little did I realize that violating firmly held traditions can raise a tsunami of opposition. The idea of moving critically ill patients into a chair was regarded as off‑the‑wall. Initially the house staff refused to cooperate and strenuously resisted getting patients out of bed. They accused me of planning to commit crimes not unlike those of the heinous Nazi experimentations in concentration camps. Arriving on the medical ward one morning I was greeted by interns and residents lined up with hands stretched out in a Nazi salute and a “Heil Hitler!” shouted in unison.

Challenging medical dogma

Why subject patients afflicted with a life‑threatening condition to a treatment that could only increase their misery and lead to major complications? This was not just a small error; it was a colossal misjudgment. Why were the deleterious consequences of strict bed rest not detected sooner? 

Medical dogmatism is sustained by a multiplicity of factors. Foremost is the fact that doctors traverse an uncertain terrain. Faced with a myriad of variables, a doctor can never be certain which measures will heal.

“Human beings, when compelled to act, learn to justify a chosen course with an assurance unwarranted by the evidence for the course chosen.”

Dr. Bernard Lown

In pondering other reasons for the practice of strict bed rest, I believe they reflected the sad truth that doctors sixty years ago had little to offer heart attack victims. When good answers are unavailable, bad answers may replace them. Bed rest seemed a logical treatment to reduce the burden on the ever-beating heart. Don’t we go to bed when we are tired?…Yet such simplistic reasoning has been responsible for blood letting, stomach freezing, using X-rays for peptic ulcers, impaling catheters in the heart to gauge its function, dispensing hormone therapy to menopausal women, administering lobotomies to the mentally ill. The list seems unending.

When a new paradigm takes hold in medicine, its acceptance is extraordinarily rapid. Few acknowledge that they once adhered to a discarded method. This was succinctly captured by the German philosopher Schopenhauer. He maintained that all truth passes through three stages: first, it is ridiculed; second, it is violently opposed; and finally, it is accepted as having always been self‑evident.

About the series

Dr. Bernard Lown (1921-2021) was a pioneering cardiologist, humanitarian, and founder of the Lown Institute. In honor of Dr. Lown, we are sharing stories from his remarkable life in his own words, through video and written content. Each episode also ties into an upcoming event sponsored by the Lown Institute Hospitals Index, where we will dive deeper into the topics that meant the most to Dr. Lown.

The post Lessons from Lown: How the Levine Chair changed heart attack treatment forever appeared first on Lown Institute.

]]>